For better or for worse, social media is everywhere, especially in high school. Whether you are sharing funny TikToks, using Snapchat to communicate with your friends, or posting on Instagram, it’s pretty much inescapable. But do its positives outweigh its negatives? And would it really be such a bad thing if younger teens couldn’t access it?
A 2024 study from the Pew Research center found that 95% of American teens report using social media at least once a day. This includes apps like YouTube, SnapChat, TikTok, Instagram, and many more. But recently, countries have taken steps to decrease the use of social media by teens. Most notably, on December 10, 2025, Australia banned the use of social media by teens under the age of 16. This ban is the first of its kind, and, according to an article by BBC news, is being enforced through financial penalties to major social media companies for allowing under-16s onto their apps. This can be prevented through many different requirements, such as government IDs or facial/vocal recognition. The U.S. had considered an act preventing social media use in people under the age of 13 called the Kids off Social Media Act, but this was struck down due to privacy concerns and worries on its effectiveness.
I propose a ban similar to Australia’s. As a 15 year old, while I enjoy the freedom that I have to browse YouTube and scroll Pinterest, I think that an age limit of 16 on most social media is a step that could improve the mental health and body images of teens my age. Excessive use of social media has long been correlated with depression and anxiety. Studies, including one by the American Psychology Association in 2023, have found a prominent connection between time spent on social media and negative body image. They discovered that when teens reduced their social media use by 50%, they became largely less insecure about their physical appearance.

There are objections to a ban like this. A big concern is whether or not it would work. Because bans like these are so recent, there is no data proving one way or the other, but I believe that something is much better than nothing. Kids will always find a way around the law ― it’s impossible to entirely stamp out the usage of social media in teens. Let’s compare it to the law against personal communication devices at LASA ― is it perfect? No. However, it has made an extreme difference in how present students are in their studies, and it has decreased the use of phones by a large amount.
Another popular worry is that it would deprive teens without healthy or supported home lives from accessing vital resources, like mental health help, sexual education, and just general support. This is an incredibly important concern and should be considered. I do, however, believe that because of the limited scope of this potential act and how many apps it wouldn’t be able to effect that this access to the outside world could still be maintained. For example, in Australia, alternative social apps like Lemon8 have seen a spike in downloads.
A ban preventing people under the age of 16 using social media could be an incredibly helpful tool used to decrease screen time and insecurity in adolescents. It isn’t perfect and would involve some trial and error, but I believe that it is important for our country to protect ourselves and future generations.